A new lattice, and another modification. Would the new client handle the RF phases better than the older client? Would the finer control of the phases make a difference? Only one way to find out.
The best design was 3.440846% by a Boinc Wrapper user (there is no way to tell who it is)
An unofficial blog about the Muon1 Distributed particle Accelerator project
2012-04-27
2012-04-20
Best Designs - Linac900Ext10td2
The lattices are experimenting with the RF phase, and how that affects the yield and design. When 7tc2 took the worst of the d2 batch and inverted the phase, now we're taking the best, 10d2, and extending the max simulation time, giving 10td2.
The best design was 3.132038% by Team Norway's Steinrar
The best design was 3.132038% by Team Norway's Steinrar
2012-04-13
Best Designs - Linac900Ext6Xc2
The release of v4.45 meant we needed a new lattice. This lattice, a redo of 6tc2, only accepts 4.45 results, rather than 4.44d, in an aim to make it more accurate.
The best design was 3.858423% by a Boinc Wrapper user (there is no way to tell who it is)
The best design was 3.858423% by a Boinc Wrapper user (there is no way to tell who it is)
2012-04-06
Best Designs - Linac900Ext7tc2
Does phase really matter? We increased the yield when we extended the time, and re-centered the phase range with Linac900Ext6tc2, but is that sort of improvement possible on the worst of the d2 lattices? Let's see...
The best design was 3.730295% by a Boinc Wrapper user (there is no way to tell who it is)
The best design was 3.730295% by a Boinc Wrapper user (there is no way to tell who it is)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)