Best Designs - PhaseRotEby5

PhaseRotDD was quite succesful in improving PhaseRotD, so can we improve PhaseRotC, the best design so far, in the same way?

The best design was 2.158242% by DutchPowerCows' ZMT~Mmikie

We now know determinism works. The new method for dealing with optimising designs has worked several times before now, so let's put it to work on the best design of the 10GeV field, PhaseRotC. At the same time, let's extend the range for decay and phase rotation area lengths (giving some new designs untested before), but save on complexity, by dealing with these in groups of 5, rather than individually.

The search space is in the 10²⁵⁸ range with 86 parameters. The lattice showed a single-stage growth pattern.

This is the 'best' design as recreated in v4.45. The original simulation length as recorded was 12 minutes 35 seconds.




The music is Solar Wind by Jamie Heras
released under a CC-BY-NC-SA license

Next time, PhaseRotEb6

DATA

Lattice

PhaseRotEby5

Date of release

November 16th, 2007

Total possible number of permutations

10²⁵⁸ (1 with 258 zeros after it)

Number of Simulations Run

353,689

Total MPTS

89,830,502.2

Design
#gen=4;#runs=5;d10l=046;d15l=006;d1l=000;d20l=054;d25l=009;d2l=470;d30l=000;d35l=010;d3l=997;d40l=071;d4l=215;d5l=000;d6l=021;d7l=454;d8l=386;d9l=244;decaycells=874;pd1=009;pd10=005;pd5=000;phaserotcells=011;prf10p=997;prf10v=999;prf1p=188;prf1v=998;prf5p=157;prf5v=999;ps10f=889;ps10l=998;ps1f=917;ps1l=861;ps5f=000;ps5l=590;s10f=018;s10l=782;s10r=414;s15f=000;s15l=815;s15r=473;s1f=998;s1l=773;s20f=005;s20l=837;s20r=467;s25f=000;s25l=801;s25r=487;s2f=005;s2l=490;s2r=743;s30f=000;s30l=811;s30r=465;s35f=000;s35l=774;s35r=440;s3f=026;s3l=046;s3r=960;s40f=012;s40l=753;s40r=425;s45f=011;s45l=820;s45r=490;s4f=982;s4l=001;s4r=819;s5f=867;s5l=314;s5r=817;s6f=693;s6l=557;s6r=944;s7f=995;s7l=134;s7r=644;s8f=938;s8l=238;s8r=539;s9f=005;s9l=770;s9r=955;tantalumrodr=004;tantalumrodz=495;
2.158242 (1977.4 Mpts) [v4.44d] <PhaseRotEby5> by [DPC]ZMT~Mmikie